A chattel can be defined as any item of tangible
movable property. It is a personal possession which does not include real
estate. The Black’s Law Dictionary defines a chattel as an article of personal property;
any species of property not amounting to a freehold or fee in land. Chattels are
into categories, chattels real which include leaseholds and chattels personal.
Section 2 of the Chattel Transfer Act
defines a chattel as any movable property that can be completely transferred by
delivery, and includes machinery, stock and the natural increase of stock as hereinafter
mentioned, crops and wool, but does not include—
a)
title deeds, choses in action or
negotiable instruments;
b) shares
and interests in the stock, funds or securities of any government or local
authority;
c) shares
and interests in the capital or property of any company or other corporate
body; or
d)
debentures and interest coupons issued
by any government, or local authority, or company, or other corporate body;
Chattel security denotes the security
that one may use to secure payment of money. The most common one is chattel
mortgage which financial institutions use to secure payment of money used to
purchase chattels such as motor vehicles. In a chattel mortgage, a financier
agrees to finance purchase of a chattel, in exchange; the financier holds title
to the chattel until full payment of the amount loaned is paid. In case of
failure by grantor to settle the purchase price, the financier has the right to
sell the chattel and satisfy the unpaid amounts.
Whether a chattel security is arising
from a purchase or a chattel the grantor already owns, it is a condition of
chattel transfer that the grantee must have the right and full power to
transfer the chattel. The chattel should not be subject to any encumbrance that
may interfere with the grantee’s interest of the chattel. Until the grantor
makes default in payment of any money secured, the grantee has the right to
retain the chattel and use it, but in such a manner that may not affect the
interest that the grantee has over the chattel.
In addition, the grantor should at all
times, while any moneys remain owing on the chattel security, keep and maintain
all and singular the chattels assigned in the same good order and condition in
which they are at the date of assignment; and, if any of them are damaged or destroyed,
or cease to exist, he should repair the damage, or replace the chattels so
destroyed or ceasing to exist, with other chattels of the same nature; and
further should, if required so to do by the grantee, execute any instrument
that may be necessary to give to the grantee security over chattels replacing
the chattels which have been destroyed or have ceased to exist.
Where legal process issues against the
chattels of a judgment-debtor for the execution of a judgment of any court, and
those chattels, or any of them, are comprised in a chattel security instrument,
the officer charged with the execution of the process may, in lieu of seizing
and selling the chattels so comprised, sell the right, title and interest of
the judgment-debtor therein. The grantee of the instrument (financier) may
however take possession of the chattel but he shall be deemed to hold it in
trust for the purchaser until the amount secured by the chattel instrument is
settled by the judgment debtor (grantor/borrower).
If the grantor of the instrument fails
to settle the secured amount and the grantee sells the chattel as per the
chattel instrument. He holds any excess proceeds of sale in trust for the
purchaser. This therefore means that where a chattel is sold to settle a judgment
debt against a judgment debtor, the purchaser only purchases the interest not
covered by the grantee until such time as the judgment debtor may settle the
amount secured and the purchaser will hold the full interest over the chattel. This
follows from the fact that a grantor’s interest in a chattel is limited by the
interest held by the grantee over the chattel.
No comments:
Post a Comment