Showing posts with label case. Show all posts
Showing posts with label case. Show all posts

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

LEGAL DEFINITION OF MONEY



The Black’s Law Dictionary defines money as a generic term that embraces every description of coin or bank-notes recognized by common consent as a representative of value in effecting exchanges of property or payment of debts. It goes ahead to quote the case of Hopson versus Fountain 5 Humph Tenn. 140 in which the court stated “Money is used in a specific and also in a general and more comprehensive sense. In its specific sense, it means what is coined or stamped by public authority, and has its determinate value fixed by governments. In its more comprehensive and general sense, it means wealth.”
The court in Moss v Hancock ([1899] 2 QB 111, England), in defining money sated;
"Money ... (is) that which passes freely from hand to hand throughout the community in final discharge of debts and full payment for commodities, being accepted equally without reference to the character or credit of the person who offers it and without the intention of the person who receives it to consume it or apply it to any other use than in turn to tender it to others in discharge of debts or payment of commodities."
Similarly, the court in Re Alberta Statutes ([1938] SCR 100) defined money as
"Any medium which by practice fulfills the function of money and which everyone will accept as payment of a debt is money in the ordinary sense of the word even though it may not be legal tender."

Saturday, 14 January 2017

ELEMENTS OF A PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM


Personal injury claims fall under negligence. For one to prove a personal injury claim, they must prove that all the elements of negligence are present.
  • Duty of care
One must prove that the defendant owed him a duty of care. Generally, anyone driving on a road owes a duty of care to everyone else using that same road. This elements is governed by the neighbour principle. You owe a duty of care to anyone who would be described as a neighbour. A neighbour is any person who is closely affected by your actions that you ought to have them in contemplation when directing your mind to any acts.
  • Breach of duty of care
One must prove that the defendant breached this duty of care. If the defendant did anything which a reasonable person would tell would be dangerous of harmful or likely to cause harm to you, that is enough to show he breached a duty of care. For example, veering or allowing the vehicle to veer off the road to the wrong side of the road, failing to steer his motor vehicle in the proper cause,driving on the wrong side of the road without any or due regard for the lives of the occupants of oncoming vehicles, or failing to brake timeously in order to avoid an accident.
  • Suffered actual damage
In addition to showing that the defendant owed a duty of care which he breached, it is important for the defendant to show that he suffered actual damage. This could be an injury to his body. The way to prove this is using medical reports. The medical report will prove how the injury you suffered was directly caused by the said accident. If the injuries render you incapable of continuing with your job, you may also plead loss of future earnings. Generally, any loss directly related with the accident will fall under damage suffered.
  • Causation
You must prove that the injuries suffered were as a result of the accident. Even if the negligence or failure to take reasonable care was not the sole cause of the injury, it is important to show that the accident contributed to it.